|
FHA Myth #1 FHA loans can do many things that conventioanal loans cannot. I'll start by dispelling some of the myths that I keep hearing. FHA loans are harder to get done then conventional. Actually, it is the opposite. In most cases, FHA has more lenient restrictions then conventional. Here are some examples:
Listen here
Top |
|
|
|
There are some important things to understand when
making an
offer where you will use and FHA loan. First, the
condition of
the
property is important. A termite report is required.
Also, an
appraiser may comment on repairs that he feels are
health and
safety issues. Examples are, torn or filthy carpet,
holes in
walls, broken appliances, missing light fixtures,
broken windows,
etc. The idea is that buyers with minimum down
payments will not
be facing expenses or dangers when they move in. Also, FHA offers
a unique refinance opportunity to borrowers. If rates
drop, you
can get a new loan that DOES NOT require new credit,
new
appraisal, new income documentation, etc! You simply
replace
your existing loan with a better one!
|
|
Loans for government employees can have some great
advantages.
These programs allow employees who are contributing
into their
retirement funds to obtain a home loan with only 3.0%
down.
There are three reasons these loans are even better
than FHA
loans. First, the loan is broken into two loans. The
first is
at 80% and avoids any MI premiums. Second, the junior
lien
requires no payments for five years. It still acrues
interest
at the same rate the first loan does, however, it is
deferred
until year 6. Finally, the borrower must have only
1.0% of their
own money as down payment.
|
|
Why wait for the market to go down? I'm not sure that the market isn't pretty close to where it should be given normal appreciation. Normally, we expect property to appreciate at the rate of about 6-8% per year. If you had purchased a home in 2001 for $120,000 (just before prices skyrocketed) in 2006 it would have appraised at about $400,000. Now, however it would appraise at about $190,000. Assume a 7% per year increase from 2001 until 2008 (2009 is too young to tell) your home would have increased in equity to $192,683.80, right on target. If you assume 6% growth it would be lower and 8% higher, but you get the idea. Now let's consider the market going down another 10%.If interest rates were to increase during that same period by only 1-2% you would have lost the 10% advantage on a 30 year loan. Here's how it works:
Purchase the same home in a year for 10% less with a $270,000, 30-year loan at 7.5%. Monthly payments would be about $1876 per month, a difference of $165/month. Multiply that by the 360 monthly payments and you would have paid $59,400 more by waiting for the market to go down. But wait! What if the interest rates stay the same
or go down. Maybe they will, but we are already at the
low ebb in the interest rates. Do you really want to
buck the odds and take the risk?
|
|
$8000 Tax Credit Here are the basics that you should know:
Top |